Why should
innovation be national, why bound to a language or country?
Isn't it that every
real valuable innovation passes all kind of limits like:
geographical, borders, even time?
In our trial to
make life easier and nicer, aren't we all together?
I'm very convinced
that everybody has the right to an anyway unavoidable egoism,
seen personal and for communities, like nations. But this egoism
can be chosen in a way to be an advantage (or at least
acceptable) for all the other egoistic human interests on earth,
which are good willing and do not attack or damage others. Isn't
it? Good business is the perfect example, I believe
A good way to live
ones own egoism and to be undoubtful an advantage for the
society is innovation, but it is not easy to transform it in a
real advantage for all sides
On my way to make
product ideas and technical innovations, which I was convinced
to be an advantage for the later user, in real objects and
money, I found a lot of difficulties like:
protecting the idea
/ innovation (patent, trademark, industrial property right). A
product idea without technical innovation is almost not possible
to protect
search for partners
search for money (capital investment) or prospective buyers
protection from
egoism and hatred of other society members which are not good
willing
...
The way from having
useful ideas to making them useful is generally hard and long.
When reasons occur to change the country we are living in,
should this make all these trials or their start impossible?
Can useful
innovation happen today just from experts in an environment
where it was planed and expected and where it can easily be
exploited? How many good ideas are lost with this restriction?
Shouldn't the financial return expected from an idea be taken mostly by those, contributing to its implementation? Avoiding national limits grows chances for implementation in a product and same time lifts number of potential users and reduces the time to availability, isn't it?
Gathering ideas from everyone gives a good view on the market, the actual demand. Especially it shows, where a need for a solution is seen, giving also a solution. Therefore the market chances for innovation happening outside of research centers are better than many investors or potential buyers estimate. Doesn't this worth to think about it?